No 223 of Living Life Series 1
Who can say that one sect or faith is better than the others? Anyone perhaps can say so but yet all should never say so. You may wonder why this is so. Let us bring you round to the realisation that all are one and one is all. The simple is yet the most complex and perhaps also philosophical. The most philosophical is yet also simple. This is true of any faith otherwise the faith will not reach out to various sections of society.
Take for example meditation. There is one pointedness as well as awareness or insight meditation (basically two types). The fruits or outcome include joy, absorptions, ecstasy. Some religions simply appear not to have meditation but what they refer to as prayers have the same effect of meditation. They feel an inexplicable joy and described this as union with the holy spirit or God. This is similar or akin to the 'piti' or joy described by Buddhists in their meditation. What Buddhists and Hindus describe as 'jhanas' or absorptions of various levels are experienced by theists when they fast for days and pray to God in seclusion or wilderness. They describe experiences of being engulfed and transported to vast expanse of light or vision with intense ecstasy or sense of fulfilment. They say they have union with God. Even the very act of singing hymns or even talking in tongues is a form of trying to be one with God, that is a form of prayer, worship or meditation, whatever you may wish to refer to.
Even the practice of offerings is another example. Some offer water, fruits, food but some offer tithes, money, time and even themselves. All are examples of what we can give to God. Which religion is better at this is not the issue but the issue is that God and saints do not need them but it is still a practice to be encouraged but in the wise and sensible way.
Even if one gives nothing and just say that one will improve and better oneself, that too in a way is an offering --- an offering to love oneself and do better for oneself. That is what God wants us to do and have. That is the best we can do justice and give credit to God and saints.
Thus be it obvious offering, new ways of offering or apparently no offering and just self love and cultivation, it is still an offering and yet not an offering. Whatever we give to God, God does not need and if He needs, then there is cause for concern. Is He omnipotent and all perfect? Are we not belittling Him by offering to Him what we would otherwise offer to great men? Are we not measuring Him like we measure our fellow men? (See not the man in God and the God in man. Man is man and God is God.)
Thus the issue is whether there is the need or perhaps there is none. Is there the need? Is there the need to say that all practices and religions are different or the same? 'Yes' and 'No' and both 'Yes' and 'No' and perhaps neither as well. All depend on where you are coming from. All are one and one is all. Is there the need to talk like that and to twist words like that? This is perhaps food for thought.
This is exactly what Lord Bo Tien tries to convey to us on the oneness and yet distinctness of faiths and sects. There is oneness as there is common purpose with God and divinity as the inner truth behind all. There is distinctiveness or separateness as they are distinct faiths and ways of approach.
.