No 1195 of Living Life Series 1
If there was not for birth would there be death? If there was not for loss would there be gain? If there was not for sunrise, would there be sunset? If there was not for man would there be woman?
Why is one favored when without the other, how can that one exist? But do we need both? Can't we have neither?
If there is no diversity, how can there be individuality or oneness in diversity. Can we not have everything? Can we have nothing?
Can there be solutions without problems? Can we have problems without solutions?
Can there be night without day? Can men rest without work? Can men work without rest?
Can there be good without bad? Can there be bad without good? Can we have God without Satan? Can there be Satan without God?
It seems that duality is here to stay. Perhaps good is bad and bad is good. How absurd can this be? But life is like that.
The good lord Lord Bo Tien 武天菩萨 says that as long as there is man, there will be problems. The problems of men are many and plentiful. Life for man would be absurd isn't it? But that is the man we know.
He said that with sunrise, there is sunset and man must work half the time and rest the other half. Why not have neither or have one without the other?
In man is the God and yet in man too is the Devil. When can man not be like that. Even the religion of man specifies both Hell and Heaven. Give this some thought.
Can we be on top of the absurdity of life? Can we not have everything and nothing? What would we have then?
This is what we should know otherwise round and round we go. We will seem to go nowhere while going somewhere all the time.
Where will there be the peace? When will we stand still while moving on in life? When will we move life and not be moved around by life. What is the goal or end and what are the means? Means are not ends and ends are not means.
The good lord gives a clear answer but the mind of men may not be able to see the truth. He said that for clear water we must not be swept downstream but we must just go against the current to go upstream.
Isn't this common to all religions? Then why not have only one religion? But there cannot only be one when the thinking of men is far from one.
Religions do reflect the nature of men. Men are one but not one. This is the truth in men as well as the absurdity of men. We should neither go for one nor all but we should not go for none. This is the trilogy of one, all and none which we should not have.
We should be on top of life and not let life be on top of us. We should be the driver of life and not be the driven.
As long as we see the absurdity of life, there is hope. We are on our way to be atop of life. We will have a little more peace when we can make sense of life often just by having common sense - Tao 道.
But many simply don't see the absurdity. Their minds are too cluttered and noisy. They just cannot think straight and clear. They cannot silent their minds and have more of the peace.
Why is one favored when without the other, how can that one exist? But do we need both? Can't we have neither?
If there is no diversity, how can there be individuality or oneness in diversity. Can we not have everything? Can we have nothing?
Can there be solutions without problems? Can we have problems without solutions?
Can there be night without day? Can men rest without work? Can men work without rest?
Can there be good without bad? Can there be bad without good? Can we have God without Satan? Can there be Satan without God?
It seems that duality is here to stay. Perhaps good is bad and bad is good. How absurd can this be? But life is like that.
The good lord Lord Bo Tien 武天菩萨 says that as long as there is man, there will be problems. The problems of men are many and plentiful. Life for man would be absurd isn't it? But that is the man we know.
He said that with sunrise, there is sunset and man must work half the time and rest the other half. Why not have neither or have one without the other?
In man is the God and yet in man too is the Devil. When can man not be like that. Even the religion of man specifies both Hell and Heaven. Give this some thought.
Can we be on top of the absurdity of life? Can we not have everything and nothing? What would we have then?
This is what we should know otherwise round and round we go. We will seem to go nowhere while going somewhere all the time.
Where will there be the peace? When will we stand still while moving on in life? When will we move life and not be moved around by life. What is the goal or end and what are the means? Means are not ends and ends are not means.
The good lord gives a clear answer but the mind of men may not be able to see the truth. He said that for clear water we must not be swept downstream but we must just go against the current to go upstream.
Isn't this common to all religions? Then why not have only one religion? But there cannot only be one when the thinking of men is far from one.
Religions do reflect the nature of men. Men are one but not one. This is the truth in men as well as the absurdity of men. We should neither go for one nor all but we should not go for none. This is the trilogy of one, all and none which we should not have.
We should be on top of life and not let life be on top of us. We should be the driver of life and not be the driven.
As long as we see the absurdity of life, there is hope. We are on our way to be atop of life. We will have a little more peace when we can make sense of life often just by having common sense - Tao 道.
But many simply don't see the absurdity. Their minds are too cluttered and noisy. They just cannot think straight and clear. They cannot silent their minds and have more of the peace.