A temple or house of God should solely be for serving the spiritual needs by providing devotional, and doctrinal understanding and practices.
For devotion, while group devotion is good, pragmatically devotion is between the individual person and God or heavenly saint.
For doctrinal understanding and practices, there are guidance sessions and meditation sessions where the better informed like the clergy can guide the laity.
For devotion, while group devotion is good, pragmatically devotion is between the individual person and God or heavenly saint.
For doctrinal understanding and practices, there are guidance sessions and meditation sessions where the better informed like the clergy can guide the laity.
In the old days, a temple or house of God is either a temple without clergy having been built by grateful devotees of God and saint, or a temple started by a monk or priest and run by him. Devotees and followers just go there to pray and to support in cash or kind.
With time, there is change. Temples are no longer just buildings for people to go for personal devotional needs but become centers for the people of society to meet like in community centers.
With urbanization, there is less interpersonal networking in society. A temple becomes a place like a village of old where people can relate to one another more closely. Naturally, the people take over the running of a temple and decide what should be done.
Where there are clergy like monks and pastors, they decide and call the tune. The laity has to go along.
Another unavoidable development is that the congregation will then throw up a few to be in the clergy. Then the clergy is like the flock and may well accentuate the failings of the flock rather than ratify them.
There is no doubt that the people is the temple and not the building but when people in modern society are squeezed out of society and has to go to a temple, what could be expected if they can call the tune. They will be spiritual on the external front but consciously or subconsciously, their social needs will come to the fore.
The temples of 2014 and beyond will function more as community enclaves more than spiritual enclaves. Men who are more worldly than spiritual will take the lead and even end up as monks and pastors.
The house of God would then risk taking on the trappings of a commercial organisation or as some put it more nicely a charitable one without the proper set up of checks and balance more so when the majority take the leader as the stand in for the God or the saint of that temple.
Thus a temple may end up what it was not in days of old. But this is unavoidable. Men and women of spiritual inclination must learn from the strength and weaknesses of fellow men and women. This did the good lord Lord Bo Tien (武天菩萨) advise. This too is learning. Life is the living gospel.
The good lord too says that the people is the temple not the building. What the people do, be it right or not so right is worth reflecting on. We can learn from what people do in and outside a temple particularly why there is no separation of the secular and non secular but instead blurring of what is secular and non secular.
Lord Bo Tien (武天菩萨) |
Why can't we run a temple as a simple temple? Perhaps Confucius (孔夫子) is right. "Life is really simple but men insist on making it complicated."
Confucius (孔夫子) |
That is why religion can end up becoming more a burden than an asset to the world. Humanity end up divided in the name of religion when religions are for the common good and are one in God. Religions should not be like political parties vying for votes.
Religions are meant to unite men in God and saints. This is the universal message of God through Lord Bo Tien (武天菩萨) - a messenger of Heaven.
There are God and saints. There is need to have inner peace. These constitute the common base of all religions - The Inner Truth
Ji Gong (济公) |
Religions are man-made though they have to do with God and saints. Certainly God and saints are not man-made...