No 1306 of Living Life Series 1
Do we regard religion as religion or do we run it as a commercial enterprise?
In a commercial enterprise, freebies and attractions like road shows are provided to bring in the crowd and then comes the selling and profiteering.
Religion is a charity. But charity cannot seem to go far without commercialisation. Will religion stay on track as a religion if it is run with view to profiteering? Who gains from profiteering?
It is the owners or shareholders. In religion, who are the owners? Who are the stakeholders?
They should be the congregation. If profiteering benefits and put cash into the pockets of the congregation, then it is not what we expect of a commercial enterprise.
Would God sanction the commercialisation of his love and outreach to men?
In the old days, the answer is obvious but not so in the modern era of 2016 and beyond.
Even a website would offer religious blogs to advertise to attract readers - to pay to reach out for more.
But one guiding principle that even the good lord Lord Bo Tien 武天菩萨 echoes is that the ways of man are not the ways of God and heavenly saints. This applies to any religion.
Religion must have funds. Funds must come from voluntary donations - from the heart without expecting anything in return.
If a man expects profits from his giving, then he too has gone the way of commercialisation. This has indeed been going on since time immemorable.
It would be sad if religion must be run like a commercial enterprise to bring in funds. That would be more like profiteering and for whose pockets? It should be the pockets of the people religion serve and not the echelon of a few men who run the religion.
God do not need to profit from men. But men may use God's good name in vain - just for profits.
In a commercial enterprise, freebies and attractions like road shows are provided to bring in the crowd and then comes the selling and profiteering.
Religion is a charity. But charity cannot seem to go far without commercialisation. Will religion stay on track as a religion if it is run with view to profiteering? Who gains from profiteering?
It is the owners or shareholders. In religion, who are the owners? Who are the stakeholders?
They should be the congregation. If profiteering benefits and put cash into the pockets of the congregation, then it is not what we expect of a commercial enterprise.
Would God sanction the commercialisation of his love and outreach to men?
In the old days, the answer is obvious but not so in the modern era of 2016 and beyond.
Even a website would offer religious blogs to advertise to attract readers - to pay to reach out for more.
But one guiding principle that even the good lord Lord Bo Tien 武天菩萨 echoes is that the ways of man are not the ways of God and heavenly saints. This applies to any religion.
Religion must have funds. Funds must come from voluntary donations - from the heart without expecting anything in return.
If a man expects profits from his giving, then he too has gone the way of commercialisation. This has indeed been going on since time immemorable.
It would be sad if religion must be run like a commercial enterprise to bring in funds. That would be more like profiteering and for whose pockets? It should be the pockets of the people religion serve and not the echelon of a few men who run the religion.
God do not need to profit from men. But men may use God's good name in vain - just for profits.